
What did you like? What did you not like? What worked well? What could we do better next time?
(And there will be a next time...)
ALSO, if you have BLOGS, AUDIO, VIDEO or PHOTOS from (or about) PodCamp Pittsburgh, please do the following:
This weekend was great! Thanks to everyone involved who made it a success. Good luck explaining the weekend to those who have no concept of what it is we do :) Too bad hyperlinking IRL isn't an option..sprzedam mieszkanie
Thanks to all for the great conversations and good times.
I spoke with Erik Schark after my greenscreen filming, and he mentioned that the film school had not, as hoped, filmed every session. I suggested to him that PodCampers need to take it upon themselves to ensure that some participant is filming each and every session, so that (1) we don't need to rely on others, and (2) to give people extra footage (er...byte-age...) to work with in iMovie, Final Cut or whatever they use.
I filmed Chris Brogan's talk yesterday (Sunday) morning with my iSight...I'll try posting it, though the audio wasn't all that good (in hindsight, I should have asked to use Chris' m-audio microtrack!). sprzedam bilet
I recorded the first session on my ipod but haven't reviewed it yet. It's just audio, if it's okay, I'll post it so others who want may want to refer to it for reference in creating a podcast.
Thanks to everyone again.
Sincerely,
Sarah Brim
This was not my idea, but I thought that it made sense so I'm taking initiative and posting it here for future podcamp organizers to use.
Michael Bailey
The idea was this:
If the sessions scheduled so that Saturday's were all entry level or informational content and Sunday sessions consisted of more in-depth topics it would provide an opportunity for someone show up for both days if they didn't know anything about new media.
For those people who are already a bit familiar with the basics, they could come into town Saturday night and attend a full day of in-depth, more technical sessions, and the people who attend both days get a chance to further their knowledge on day two.
Now this isn't perfect and many discussions could be held to discuss it, but as a basic suggestion I find that it does have merit.
I love that idea, Michael. If the presentations were lumped generally into one day of beginning and one day of more advanced, you could theoretically go from 0 to 60 in the two days rather than being scared off of topics that you could handle after a beginner's session or two. The question then becomes implementation, finding the structure in this free form.
I also love the idea of self-reliance in terms of filming the sessions. There are enough of us doing this who have the equipment needed to accomplish this. The issue there is logistics, making sure those who are willing to help film don't end up having to miss sessions they want to be a part of. Having a document of the session would be helpful if you're not there, but it's no substitute for being part of the interactivity.
I think one thing we can do along these lines is for everyone who held sessions to begin posting what they covered on the podcamp wiki sessions page. That should help future podcamps see what has been done and be able to take the ball further.
Re 1st day/2nd day discussion: Although it's a great idea, perhaps we could structure it this way: beginner content in the mornings, advanced content in afternoons and perhaps evenings. This way, we allow people who cannot come to either Sat or Sun to still get some newbie content - the art will, afterall, only grow with continual influx of new artists. :-)
Also, although the 30-45 min sessions are short, its really unavoidable with the short weekend. People would still grumble with 4-hour sessions in a weeklong event. :-) This event should be intended as a way to whet our collective and individual appetites for further "off-line" communication and learning.
Re: 1st day/2nd day discussion
There is a major disadvantage to that format. More novice topics will conflict with each other. More advanced topics will conflict with each other.
Example: At 10 AM, have Intro to web video (technical) , Intro to Adsense and affiliates (business) and Acting tips for Audio Podcasts (creative). Then, at 11 AM, have Advanced web video techniques (technical), Search Engine Optimization (business) and Script vs. Improv (creative). Try to balance experience level with variety of content. Obviously, any well-attended sessions should be encouraged to re-present the next day.
Michael Bailey and I have been discussing various versions of this format and are very interested in helping everyone get what they want from the PodCamp experience. By all means, let's keep kicking these ideas around.
I think that developing "tracks" of information---creative, tech and biz-- as Justin has described, is a useful way of laying out sessions.
As such, I'm not sure we need to announce PodCamp Pittsburgh 3 just yet. For one thing, it stands to reason that there are at least 12 cities in America alone that could support at least one PodCamp per year, not counting the possibilities for dual East-and-West Coast PodCamps. In that case, Pittsburgh is already in the loop as one of the East Coast cornerstones.
For another, from a logistical point of view, we have no way of knowing who'll be here in Pittsburgh in 2008, much less what the parameters of web media will be by then. Perhaps the concept of podcasting will be antiquated by then, in favor of the next big thing. Of course, even if that happens, I have a feeling Pittsburgh will find a way to jump aboard the train early...
For now, let's just make sure PodCamp Pittsburgh 1 is properly paid for and number 2 keeps generating buzz. The future will take care of itself.
(This reminds me: I spent a lot of time talking with a gent from Boston named Nate about how his interior design firm could use podcasting and blogging to create a community nased around their services. Anyone heard from him since Affogato on Sunday night? Last I knew, he bought everyone in the place a special aprting gift from the dollar store and then dashed off to catch his flight...)
UPDATE: Here's the link to our new PCPGH Community!
I was so impressed by PodCamp that I decided to write about it in my newspaper column. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette published it on Nov 18.
I was moved by the unique combination of excitement, enthusiasm, knowledge and volunteerism that took hold of the weekend. It reminded me of some of the early Internet Expo and Internet World conferences, with that "UN-conference" twist.
Thanks to Justin and all the PodCamp participants for making both days well worthwhile.
David
This was so much fun. I'm really excited that this went off so well, and that Pittsburgh folk came out in full force. When I went to the event, I was thinking: if there are 50 people, I'll be happy. But HUNDREDS? I'm so excited about the community I found there, and I'm so eager to get back.
Feedback about the event: Let's start Sunday later next time (ouch, Tiki Bar). Let's promote everyone having valid contact cards with them. Let's maybe "track" the sessions and do more to record each one (something we also will try harder to do in Boston). And let's get 300 people to attend/participate.
I'm very proud of you, Justin, Erik, and others.
--Chris Brogan...
http://Summit.CLOH.Org (old site)
The PodCamp part would then be more like a theme within the larger event. And, the PodCamp would be a build up event too. The summit would build upon smaller events from neighborhoods, specific schools and more specific uses / applications.
We could really use a Youth Tech Summit in Pittsburgh. I could become the largest annual event in Pittsburgh's Convention Center. School students could arrive by the busload. There is so much to do. And, it needs to be a bottom-up event as the *Camp culuture and open-source culture dictates.
--Mark Rauterkus, Mark at Rauterkus dot com, 412 298 3432 = cell
Page Information
|
Wiki Information |
Recent PBwiki Blog Posts |